The democratic world must stand up for the rule of law in Venezuela and oppose Maduro’s assault on the electoral process and free speech. The right-wing attack on democratic institutions anywhere is a threat to freedom everywhere."
Now, Maduro is unquestionably a socialist, a left-wing dictator. This is impossible to dispute. So why did Democrat Rep. Jamie Raskin denounce Maduro as right-wing? The answer is very simple. Maduro is no longer a socialist, Maduro is right-wing, because no one likes Maduro. That's all there is to it.
Hitler isn't repudiated as "right-wing" because he committed mass murder. Stalin committed mass murder and no one calls Stalin "right-wing". Rather, even though he was unquestionably a socialist, Hitler is repudiated as right-wing precisely because people were horrified by the mass murder.
True socialism does not horrify anyone. Socialism is, by definition, a philosophy that every correctly educated person loves and welcomes.
So, if any socialist actor, process or consequence results in the general unwashed masses feeling horror, then - by definition - that cannot have been socialist. It must have been something else. It must have been the only true enemy to socialism. It must have been... right-wing. Either that, or the masses must be uneducated, not awake (woke) to the reality of the thing they incorrectly labelled "horrible".
Sometimes the reaction of the masses is both due to their being unwoke and to it being right-wing. But no matter how socialist the actors, the process or the consequence, if the people do not love it and welcome it, then it cannot be true socialism.
This simple concept lies at the heart of every political conversation with a socialist: “right-wing” is just the label some socialists use to delegitimize other socialists. From the socialist point of view, the term has no other use. It has no other meaning. That's why a man who was clearly socialist, such as Hitler or Maduro, is necessarily "right-wing." True socialism can never be legitimately repudiated. What Hitler and Maduro did has been repudiated. Therefore, what they did was "right-wing" and not true socialism.
This is why socialists hate Christianity. Christianity says that Christians will be hated by the world. But I do not want to be hated by the world. I want the world to love me. So I cannot be a Christian, because that is hateful. I will be a socialist, because everyone loves socialism. Only haters hate socialism. Socialism will rid the world of haters. All that will remain is love. If anyone hates, it is because Christianity exists. Christians even admit that they cause hate - they admit that people hate them. Jesus even admitted that He intended people to hate them. Christians wear hate as a badge of honor. That is not rational. That is hateful. As long as anyone hates Christianity, not only will I refuse to be a Christian, but I will use that hate as evidence that Christianity should be wiped out.
This is also why "true socialism" has never been tried. There is no actor, process or consequence that has been universally accepted as good by everyone. But, we know true socialism is loved and welcomed by everyone. Thus, by definition, true socialism has never been tried. QED.
Now, this also means that we, who are loveable, can hold out hope that the world will finally awaken and realize how loveable we are. If true socialism ever were implemented, everyone would love and accept it. Thus, not only has true socialism never been tried, it is also why we know it will work this next time, because unlike the previous group, we are truly loveable people, so everyone will love it when we do it.
No comments:
Post a Comment