Lumen Gentium #25
25. ... Bishops, teaching in communion with the Roman Pontiff, are to be respected by all as witnesses to divine and Catholic truth. In matters of faith and morals, the bishops speak in the name of Christ and the faithful are to accept their teaching and adhere to it with a religious assent. This religious submission of mind and will must be shown in a special way to the authentic magisterium of the Roman Pontiff, even when he is not speaking ex cathedra; that is, it must be shown in such a way that his supreme magisterium is acknowledged with reverence, the judgments made by him are sincerely adhered to, according to his manifest mind and will. His mind and will in the matter may be known either from the character of the documents, from his frequent repetition of the same doctrine, or from his manner of speaking.
Steve,
ReplyDeleteCardinal Joseph Ratzinger said: “Not all moral issues have the same moral weight as abortion and euthanasia. For example, if a Catholic were to be at odds with the Holy Father on the application of capital punishment or on the decision to wage war, he would not for that reason be considered unworthy to present himself to receive Holy Communion. While the Church exhorts civil authorities to seek peace, not war, and to exercise discretion and mercy in imposing punishment on criminals, it may still be permissible to take up arms to repel an aggressor or to have recourse to capital punishment. There may be a legitimate diversity of opinion even among Catholics about waging war and applying the death penalty, but not however with regard to abortion and euthanasia.”
How do we reconcile the example used by, then Cardinal, Ratzinger with the change made by Pope Francis? I’m asking in the context of a Catholic’s ability to disagree with the Pope on a moral issue, albeit one that is non-infallible. Thanks.
Religious submission of mind and will is not, as you should well know, absolute and unconditional, but prudent and conditioned on the putative teaching not contradicting higher-level teachings already established.
ReplyDeleteThanks Steve.
ReplyDeleteOops. Since you’re not Steve....
Thomist philosopher Edward Feser offers the correct answer to the question, "When can we disagree with the pope?"
ReplyDelete"That capital punishment can be legitimate at least in principle is a teaching that clearly meets the criteria for being an infallible and irreformable doctrine of the ordinary Magisterium of the Church, for reasons I set out at length in a recent article at Catholic World Report. The evidence is set out in even greater depth by Joseph Bessette and I in our book By Man Shall His Blood Be Shed: A Catholic Defense of Capital Punishment.
"To contradict this traditional teaching is a doctrinal error, pure and simple – something possible when a pope is not speaking ex cathedra, albeit most popes bend over backwards to avoid even the appearance of such a thing. However, on several issues – marriage and divorce, worthiness to receive Holy Communion, contraception, capital punishment, and more – Pope Francis has repeatedly made statements that appear to contradict traditional Catholic teaching, and has persistently refused to respond to respectful requests for clarification made by members of the hierarchy and prominent theologians. Moreover, he has done so not only in offhand comments during interviews and the like, but in official magisterial documents, such as Amoris Laetitia, and now the Catechism.
"This is, to put it mildly, a highly unusual situation. These are not normal times in the Church. It was providential that the CDF under Pope St. John Paul II made it explicit, in Donum Veritatis, that Catholic theologians have the right and sometimes even the duty respectfully to raise criticisms of deficient magisterial documents. As I showed in a recent article, this teaching is by no means a novelty, but has deep roots in the tradition of the Church – for example, in Aquinas’s discussion of the right and duty of the faithful to correct errant prelates, even publicly. There can be no reasonable doubt that the norms set out by Donum Veritatis, by Aquinas, and by this neglected part of Catholic tradition in general, are by no means of merely theoretical interest. They have urgent contemporary practical application. . . ."
http://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2018/08/pope-francis-and-capital-punishment.html