Monday, April 24, 2023

Dying Through the Centuries

The Reuben Fleet Science Museum in San Diego lists the top 10 causes of death in America in 1850, 1900, and 2000. And therein lies a tale...

Top 10 Causes of Death


18501900
1Tuberculosis (lung)Pneumonia (lung)
2Dysentery/Diarrhea (GI tract)Tuberculosis (lung)
3Cholera (GI tract)Diarrhea (GI tract)
4Malaria (blood)Heart disease 
5Typhoid Fever (GI tract)Stroke
6Pneumonia (lung)Liver disease (alcohol)
7Diptheria (lung)Accidents
8Scarlet Fever (throat)Cancer
9Meningitis (spinal cord)Normal aging
10Whooping cough (lung)Diptheria (lung)



20002022
1Heart disease (smoking, diabetes, high cholesterol, blood pressure)Heart disease
2Cancer (smoking, UV, obesity, alcohol)Cancer
3Stroke (same causes as heart disease)WuFlu/Covid19 (lung)
4Lung disease (smoking)Accidents 
5AccidentsStroke
6DiabetesChronic lower respiratory diseases (smoking)
7Pneumonia/Influenza (lung)Alzheimer's disease
8Alzheimer's diseaseDiabetes
9Kidney disease (high blood pressure, diabetes)Chronic liver disease/Cirrhosis (alcohol)
10Blood poisoning/septicemiaNephritis/Nephrosis (kidney)

2022 Top 10 Causes of Death by number of dead:

  1. Heart disease: 695,547 (high blood pressure, high cholesterol, smoking, diabetes)
  2. Cancer: 605,213 (smoking, UV rays, obesity, alcohol)
  3. COVID-19: 416,893   (lung)
  4. Accidents:   224,935
  5. Stroke: 162,890 (high blood pressure, high cholesterol, smoking, diabetes)
  6. Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 142,342  (smoking)
  7. Alzheimer’s disease: 119,399
  8. Diabetes: 103,294
  9. Chronic liver disease and cirrhosis : 56,585 (alcohol)
  10. Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 54,358 (kidney disease)

Why did the causes of death change so dramatically in just two centuries? In the 1800s, everyone used wood, charcoal or coal to cook and to heat their homes. Constantly breathing in wood, charcoal and coal smoke contributed to lung infections. Similarly, without knowledge of germ theory, clean water sources were difficult to locate and difficult to maintain. While even Hippocrates understood that water needed some kind of sand sieve to remove sediment and improve smell and taste, the idea that cleaning beyond this might be necessary would not arise until Leeuwenhoek's microscope (1670s) demonstrated the existence of bacilli and Pasteur's experiments (1861) linked bacilli to the existence of disease. 

Cholera is a fine example of the difficulty this lack of knowledge caused. For centuries prior to 1870, people had known cholera outbreaks frequently followed large thunderstorms. They just didn't fully understand why: if latrines were sourced too close to drinking water, the flooding that often accompanied thunderstorms would cause the two to commingle. The London water pump incident in 1854 showed the link between water and cholera. Pasteur linked bacilli to disease. By 1883, the link between the cholera bacillus and  water-based cholera outbreaks had been definitively made. As a result, by the 1890s, American cities had begun chlorination and steam treatment of water. Gastro-intestinal diseases in the U.S. began to disappear. 

Today, it is hard to understand how quickly the lack of clean water and clean air used to kill people, but the lists demonstrate the fact. Consider alcohol. Every historical source acknowledges that colonial Americans drank enormous amounts of alcohol. However, historians rarely point out the smoke from cooking fires and the un-boiled water used to make meals generally killed people before alcohol-related liver disease could. Likewise, many modern commentators snigger over the fact that Robert Baden-Powell's first Boy Scout manual (1908) insisted "on the necessity of keeping one’s blood clean by having at least one bowel movement a day", but these same modern comedians fail to consider the Baden-Powell grew up at a time (mid-1800s) when most people died of infectious diarrheas like cholera, dysentery, typhus and typhoid.

By 1900, just as the Boy Scouts began to systematically teach a generation of children to be concerned about their daily bowel movements, urban water sources had been cleaned up enough to essentially eliminate deadly GI tract infections. The elimination of speedy GI tract killers allowed slower diseases, like alcoholic liver disease, to enter the top ten list. America's Temperance movement had begun in the early 1800s, but it didn't achieve much success until clean drinking water and alcohol-related liver disease caused a huge change in the most common causes of death. With GI tract disease greatly reduced, heart disease, stroke, cancer, accidents and - most important for the Prohibitionists - alcoholic liver disease were now able to climb the list and replace the various forms of diarrhea as major killers.

We had learned how to handle water; we still didn't have a solution for smoke-filled air. Because charcoal, coal and wood remained the most common ways to heat and to cook, the top ten list in 1900 was still dominated by lung ailments. The invention of gas and electric stoves changed that.

The British inventor James Sharp developed the gas stove in 1826. It debuted in the London Exhibition of 1851, but didn't become popular in the US until the beginning of the 20th century. By 1930, 14 million households cooked with gas, 7.7 million used coal and wood, 6.4 million used oil, and 0.875 million used electricity. Gas stoves meant not only a huge reduction in smoke and its particulate aerosols, but also the end of coal dust all over the kitchen. But, while natural gas was certainly better than charcoal, natural gas has never been as clean as electric stoves are. It is not surprising to see the natural gas stove slowly being replaced by the electric stove. As of 2015, 91% of homes had a stove/oven unit; 61% electric, 33% natural gas. 

This century-long change in indoor air quality essentially removed lung diseases from the top ten causes of death in America. As of 2022, we are left with high blood pressure, smoking, alcohol and viral diseases as the major slayers of men in wealthy societies. Keep in mind, no one knew virii even existed until 1892. No one understood "death by virus" was even an option until roughly 1900. Virii would not be understood as obligate parasites until 1926. Similarly, the need for various vitamins was not understood until the early 1800s and discoveries were still on-going through the mid-twentieth century, and arguably into the present-day.

Notice the lists given above are the top ten causes of death in wealthy societies. Not every 21st century society is wealthy.

The WHO lists global causes of death by income group. The four income groups the WHO categorizes merely recapitulates most of this essay. The poorest countries, countries that cannot source clean drinking water, societies that still use animal dung and wood/charcoal to cook their food and to heat their homes, still die primarily from GI-tract infections and lung diseases. Their top 10 death list looks pretty much like our 1800's top ten death list. Worse, today's poor countries see their children die at a rate rich countries no longer pretend to have. But, as my eldest son reminded me, rich countries now hide the deaths of children behind abortion rates. 

While neonatal death was not listed in the American 1800 "top ten", that was an oversight on the part of the Reuben museum. Between 10 and 30% of children in post-colonial America died before their fifth birthday. If neonatal death were given its proper place in the 1850's list, it would top the chart. Today's poorest countries live the same life 1850's America lived: about 30% of their children die in the first year. If you are serious about comparing neonatal deaths, then we should remember roughly 30% of America's children die today via abortion.   That is, children in both poor and rich countries actually die at the same rate, but while children in poor countries die from disease, children in rich countries are murdered by their relatively wealthy parents. 

And this is but one indicator to demonstrate that, as income rises, access to clean water, non-smoke cooking methods and abortion changes the leading causes of death. As income rises, child death is hidden inside of abortion statistics. GI tract infection disappears and lung-infection deaths are reduced. As income rises, slower deaths of nutrition (heart disease/stroke/diabetes), brain disease (Alzheimer's) and various cancers replace the faster and more virulent bacterial and viral causes of death. 

The wealthy have discovered how to stop most viral, bacterial and inhaled-particulate deaths. We kill off the inconvenient children, allowing only convenient children to live. Now we concentrate on nutritional deficiencies and aging-related deaths. Progress is being made on both of the latter fronts. In another century, what kills rich folk today may only afflict the poorest of the poor, and by today's standards, tomorrow's poorest may not be considered poor. So, in a century, what will be left to kill the rich? When we finally conquer poverty, will we also conquer death? 

Monday, April 03, 2023

Virgins are Better than Married People

So, I recently pointed out:

The Catholic meaning of human sexuality is, if you have sex, you cannot get into the highest tier of heaven. Participation in the creative life-giving power of God makes you ineligible for the highest eternal level of union with God.

An uninformed person replied, "Um. The Church teaches that absolutely nowhere. You shouldn't speak lies or misrepresent doctrine. It just makes you look like a moron.... Scripture does not make the claim you very erroneously ascribe to it. In fact, the height of the spiritual life is the *wedding feast* of the Lamb."

Well, unfortunately for that uninformed person, the Church wrote Scripture, Scripture is inerrant, and the Church absolutely DOES teach in Scripture that virginity is greater. 

"...he who marries the virgin does right, but he who does not marry her does better" (1 Cor 7:38)

Or read Rev 14:4:

And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father's name written in their foreheads. 2 And I heard a voice from heaven, as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of a great thunder: and I heard the voice of harpers harping with their harps: 3 And they sung as it were a new song before the throne, and before the four beasts, and the elders: and no man could learn that song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were redeemed from the earth. 4 These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb. 5 And in their mouth was found no guile: for they are without fault before the throne of God.

There is also the commentary from the Catholic Encyclopedia on Virginity

"The Church, following this teaching of St. Paul, has always considered the state of virginity or celibacy preferable in itself to the state of marriage, and the Council of Trent (Sess. XXIV, Can. 10) pronounces an anathema against the opposite doctrine....

This perfect integrity of body, enhanced by a purpose of perpetual chastity, produces a special likeness to Christ, and creates a title to one of the three "aureolæ", which theologians mention. According to the teaching of St. Thomas (Supplement, 96) these "aureolæ" are particular rewards added to the essential happiness of eternity [emphasis added], and are like so many laurel wreaths, crowning three conspicuous victories, and three special points of resemblance to Christ: the victory over the flesh in virginity, the victory over the world in martyrdom, and the victory over the devil in the preaching of the truth. The text of St. John (Revelation 14:1-5) is often understood of virgins, and the canticle which they alone may sing before the throne denotes the "aureola" which is given to them alone. It is most probable that the words in the fourth verse, "These are they who were not defiled with women: for they are virgins", are really spoken of virgins, though there are also other interpretations; perhaps, those who "were purchased from among men, the firstfruits to God and to the Lamb: And in their mouth there was found no lie: (loc. cit., 4, 5) are the martyrs; they are declared to be without spot, as in an earlier chapter (vii, 14); they are said to "have washed their robes, and have made them white in the blood of the Lamb".

Then we have the CCC pretty much saying the same thing

1620 Both the sacrament of Matrimony and virginity for the Kingdom of God come from the Lord himself. It is he who gives them meaning and grants them the grace which is indispensable for living them out in conformity with his will.117 Esteem of virginity for the sake of the kingdom118 and the Christian understanding of marriage are inseparable, and they reinforce each other:

Whoever denigrates marriage also diminishes the glory of virginity. Whoever praises it makes virginity more admirable and resplendent. What appears good only in comparison with evil would not be truly good. The most excellent good is something even better than what is admitted to be good.119 [emphasis added]

Footnote 119 references "St. John Chrysostom, De virg. 10,1:PG 48,540; Cf. John Paul II, FC 16".

Look up Familiaris Consortio 16 and you'll see Pope St John Paul II say this:

"Virginity or celibacy, by liberating the human heart in a unique way,[40] "so as to make it burn with greater love for God and all humanity,"[41] bears witness that the Kingdom of God and His justice is that pearl of great price which is preferred to every other value no matter how great, and hence must be sought as the only definitive value. It is for this reason that the Church, throughout her history, has always defended the superiority of this charism to that of marriage, by reason of the wholly singular link which it has with the Kingdom of God.[42]" [emphasis added] 

 Of course, Pope Pius XII said the same thing in Sacra Virginitas:

24. It is first and foremost for the foregoing reasons that, according to the teaching of the Church, holy virginity surpasses marriage in excellence. ... 
49 How true is that saying of Chrysostom: "the root, and the flower, too, of virginity is a crucified life."[74] For virginity, according to Ambrose, is as a sacrificial offering, and the virgin "an oblation of modesty, a victim of chastity."[75] Indeed, St. Methodius, Bishop of Olympus, compares virgins to martyrs,[76] and St. Gregory the Great teaches that perfect chastity substitutes for martyrdom: "Now, though the era of persecution is gone, yet our peace has its martyrdom, because though we bend not the neck to the sword, yet with a spiritual weapon we slay fleshly desires in our hearts."[77] Hence a chastity dedicated to God demands strong and noble souls, souls ready to do battle and conquer "for the sake of the kingdom of heaven."[78]

So, the Church ABSOLUTELY teaches that virginity is better than marriage. A charism and discipline (virginity) is better than a FREAKING SACRAMENT (marriage). The divinizing grace of the sacrament is actually a LESSER grace than that of a mere charismatic discipline. Every one of the seven sacraments impart DIVINIZING grace, the sacraments change our natures so that we can share in the One Divine Nature itself:

460 The Word became flesh to make us "partakers of the divine nature":"For this is why the Word became man, and the Son of God became the Son of man: so that man, by entering into communion with the Word and thus receiving divine sonship, might become a son of God." "For the Son of God became man so that we might become God." "The only-begotten Son of God, wanting to make us sharers in his divinity, assumed our nature, so that he, made man, might make men gods." [emphasis added]

See that? The sacraments make men into GODS. That's in the Catechism itself. And paragraph 460 is not a one-off. Check out article 1999. Or 1988. Sacraments allow us to live out the promise of 2 Peter 1:4, they allow us to "partake of the divine nature."

 But, the sacrament of marriage - which imparts that incredible divinizing, deifying, GOD-MAKING grace to us, the divinizing grace that makes us into gods, according to the CCC - that sacrament is NOT as wonderful as simply not having sex for the sake of the Kingdom. The charism of a simple discipline is superior to EVERY sacrament except, perhaps, the Eucharist itself. Virginity for the sake of the Kingdom is not a sacrament, but it merits you a greater place in heaven than the consummated sacrament of Holy Matrimony. And if you don't consummate Holy Matrimony, you aren't as "firmly" married as the couple that does consummate marriage. It is far, far easier to get an annulment if you haven't had sex than if you have.

IF the Church be correct, a man or woman need only be baptized and celibate, and his or her place is higher in heaven than anyone who receives six, nay, even all seven sacraments, yet was not celibate.

Physical sex is the great destroyer of crowns, as even Pope St. John Paul II, "Father Theology of the Body", attested, for celibacy is a greater charism than marriage, celibacy is greater even than Holy Orders, if the priest be married, as many Eastern priests are.

And herein is a great mystery, that a married priest, although imago Dei by his ordination, is lower in heaven than a baptized virgin, for he cannot carry the three great crowns that the virgin carries. St Peter is lower in heaven than ALL the other popes who remained celibate their whole lives. Peter, the Rock, upon which the Church is founded, cannot sing the special song reserved for the virgin, who has not "defiled himself with women."

But the mere discipline, the mere charism of celibacy, is, according to the infallible Magisterium, greater than all of the sacraments combined, greater even than reception of the Eucharist, in terms of its ability to lift you to the highest paroxysms of glory.

Put that in your pipe and smoke it.